Britain’s national accounts now resemble a Ponzi scheme

Temps de lecture : 4 minutes

L’IREF cité dans The Telegraph

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language: ‘I’m from the government, and I’m here to help’.”

So said Ronald Reagan in 1986, five years into his US presidency.

Reagan grew up in a post-war world characterised by big-spending government and huge national debts. Together with Margaret Thatcher, he led the West towards an era of smaller government, emphasising free-market commerce, keeping the state out of the way.

We’re in dire need of similarly single-minded leaders. Government debts are soaring across the G7, driven by misguided pandemic-era spending, ageing populations and spiralling borrowing costs.

France, Japan, Canada, Italy and the US all have national debts well over 100pc of GDP – levels not seen since World War Two.

While the UK’s headline figure is slightly lower, at 98pc of GDP, our borrowing costs are easily the G7’s highest – in part due to our “inflation outlier” status.

During the year to September, the consumer price index rose 3.8pc, having refused to drop for three successive months, despite falling elsewhere. Average G7 inflation was just 2.5pc last month.

Financial markets are charging Britain more to borrow because this Labour Government lacks the grit to face down its massed-ranks of economically-illiterate backbench MPs – as shown by this summer’s botched attempt at extremely modest “welfare reforms”.

Welfare spending is set to rise 19pc to £373.4bn during this Parliament, with the bill for working-age health and disability benefits on course to soar 30pc to £97.9bn. Cowed by its own hard-left, the Government failed to achieve a penny of savings.

The UK, in addition, is carrying a uniquely high share of “index-linked” state debt, the servicing costs of which ratchet up with inflation, requiring more borrowing in turn.

Around 30pc of outstanding UK gilts are so-called “linkers”, compared to a G7 average well below 10pc.

On top of that, Britain has long held an unenviable reputation among smart sovereign debt investors for “hiding” state liabilities “off balance sheet”. Since Labour took office in July 2024, that tendency has become more extreme.

This is yet another reason our debt service costs are now up at £120bn a year – twice total defence spending, more than the state spends on schools.

When Labour took office in July 2024, the national debt was already well over 90pc of GDP. But Chancellor Rachel Reeves’s first Budget last October further expanded the state – more than any fiscal statement in well over a quarter of a century.

Labour raised taxation by £40bn a year and annual borrowing by £30bn, bunging large wage rises to the party’s public-sector union paymasters.

Having risen from 33pc to 36pc of GDP between 2019 and June 2024 under the Conservatives, Labour put the UK’s tax burden on course to hit 38pc of GDP by 2029/30, a peacetime record high, according to the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).

And over the last week, Reeves has admitted last year’s “once in a Parliament” tax rises were nothing of the sort. She is now signalling yet more tax rises in her second Budget statement on November 26.

The Chancellor will increase taxation even more because she and her party are politically and psychologically incapable of doing what Reagan and Thatcher did – that is, achieve budgetary stability by reining in spending, rolling back the frontiers of the state.

For this Labour Government, in contrast to Tony Blair’s “New Labour” administrations, a larger state is the ideological raison d’être.

Labour is determined to continue down the “primrose path” of ever more government spending towards Shakespeare’s “eternal bonfire” of economic stagnation and inevitable fiscal meltdown – as growth-sapping taxes drain the lifeblood from enterprise and commerce.

Britain borrowed £20.6bn in September alone, the highest level since 2020. Public sector borrowing in the current financial year, since April, is now £99.8bn, some £7.2bn above OBR forecasts published in March and £11.5bn more than the same six-month period in 2024/25.

Of the £20.6bn the Government borrowed last month, £9.7bn was spent on debt interest, two-thirds more than the same month last year.

State interest payments since April were £67bn, 2.5 times more than during the same period in 2021/22.

Britain’s national accounts resemble a Ponzi scheme.

The Chancellor is now being warned by countless business groups that further tax rises, as opposed to spending controls, will thwart growth even more – hitting tax revenues and making the public finances even weaker.

Alan Vallance, chief executive of the Institute of Chartered Accountants, says the UK is “sleepwalking into stagnation” with business confidence “in freefall”.

Marks and Spencer chief Stuart Machin is urging Reeves to “change course” ahead of her November Budget, focussing on finding cuts to public spending instead.

Yet the headline debt numbers are only the start of it.

This column has long pointed out that, on top of the official public sector net debt measure, which is 98pc of GDP, the state is also on the hook for liabilities within the Bank of England’s asset purchase scheme (APS), private finance initiative (PFI) debts and the massive ongoing cost of public sector pensions, which between them take state liabilities up to an estimated 161pc of GDP.

A new study for the Institute of Economic and Fiscal Research, authored by the financial economist Bob Lyddon, says that since Labour took office, the party has clocked up unfunded spending commitment for new infrastructure, net-zero initiatives and “industrial policy”.

This is set to be met by private investments that need to be repaid and other off-balance sheet wheezes – which push UK state liabilities up to a staggering 219pc of GDP.

“So much of Labour’s new spending is to be financed off the books,” says Lyddon. “But, as financial markets know, these ‘shadow debts’ are huge and blow Reeves’s fiscal rules to smithereens”.

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *


motif

Soutenez l’IREF et défendez une recherche indépendante !

L’IREF, think tank libéral et indépendant, est un institut privé et indépendant avec un statut d’association sans but lucratif. Ses ressources proviennent uniquement des dons privés déductibles à : 66% de l’impôt sur le revenu (IRPP), 75% de l’impôt sur la fortune immobilière (IFI), ou 60% au titre de l’impôt sur les sociétés (IS).

Recevez Contrepoints, le journal d'actualité libéral

Abonnez-vous gratuitement à notre journal d’actualité libéral. Recevez tous les matins une analyse libérale de l’actualité que vous ne trouverez nulle part ailleurs.


Illustration-newsletter